 |
Introduction
by David B. Oppenheimer
|

|
For the past
three years Californians have debated the hypothetical value
of affirmative action. At times the debate has seemed like
an academic exercise, as we argued over terms like “preferences,” “quotas,” “set-asides,” “goals” and “timetables.” But now that Gov. Wilson has identified 31
state-funded programs that he proposes to eliminate or
curtail, purportedly in order to comply with Proposition
209, we must examine these programs, and hear from the real
people who benefit from them.
The pages that follow profile the affirmative action
programs slated for elimination or revision, and eight
Californians whose lives were enriched by such programs.
They show that affirmative action means inclusion, not
exclusion. It means insuring that American Indian students,
Latina farmworkers, the sons and daughters of African
American laborers, the grandchildren of Chinese immigrants
and others are included when the school doors are open, when
public money is spent to build our roads, and when teachers
are chosen for our schools and colleges.
Despite our best efforts, discrimination has not been
eliminated from American public life. Unintended
stereotyping, marginalization and the operation of old boys
networks have resulted in vastly unequal opportunities both
for minorities and women. The programs described in this
booklet help to remedy discrimination by reaching out to the
excluded, giving them an opportunity to compete. These
programs don’t violate Proposition 209-they give no
preferences to anyone. But by bringing new faces to the
table they give life-altering opportunities to thousands of
Californians, permitting them to reach for dreams otherwise
beyond their grasp.
Eleven of the threatened programs are in education. They
range from the tiny Science, Mathematics and Technology
Teacher Pipeline Program, which provides after-school and
weekend science and math enrichment programs for elementary
and high school students in Riverside, Visalia, San Marcos
and the Oakland area, to the California Student Opportunity
and Access Program (Cal-SOAP), whose nine regional centers
around the state provide SAT training, academic preparation
for college and college counseling. The California Academic
Partnership Program has provided more than 130,000 K-12
students with mentoring through partnerships with California
businesses. Although the programs have different approaches
and serve different regions, all have this in common: they
exclude no one based on race, ethnicity or gender. What,
then, makes them affirmative action programs? Each is
designed to meet the needs of minorities and other
disadvantaged students, and each makes special efforts to
reach out to, and serve, these students.
|
|
|
Listen to
13-year-old Amber Noel, who credits the American Indian
Early Childhood Education Program (ECE)-a program Gov.
Wilson apparently wants to shut down-with her success in
school and her plans to become a physician. The program has
helped reduce the high school dropout rate for students from
her Yuba Feather school from 80 percent in the 1980s to 30
percent today, by providing American Indian children with a
combination of computer training, peer tutoring and an
understanding of traditional Indian crafts and culture. The
program is open to all students in the community, and many
non-Indians attend, but it is designed to meet the cultural
and educational needs of the Indian students, who too often
are viewed in their classrooms through the lens of TV
stereotypes.
No one in her San Joaquin Valley high school expected Dr.
Raquel Arias to go to university. In fact, a tireless
college recruiter looking for talented Latino students was
told by Dr. Arias’ former high school counselor, “Our
Mexicans don’t want to go to college, they want to stay
here.” With the assistance of a number of outreach and
mentoring programs, Dr. Arias broke through the stereotypes,
and is now a top surgeon recently appointed by Governor
Wilson to the Medical Board of California.
Cecelia Blanks, an African American mother of four who
was trying to make ends meet through dead-end jobs, was
inspired by workshops of the Black Women’s Leadership
Conference to earn a master’s degree and qualify for her
current job as a lecturer at Mira Costa Community College.
Banks credits Extended Opportunity Programs and Services
(EOPS), another threatened affirmative action program. As a
college counselor, she now inspires others who, she says, “look like me” to continue their education.
Nine of the threatened programs provide affirmative
action opportunities for women-owned and minority-owned
businesses at the state and/or local level. These programs
have been successful in bringing new faces to the table, by
breaking down the traditional networks that have excluded
women-owned and minority-owned businesses from government
contracts.
|
|
|
Contractors must
make “good-faith efforts” to notify these formerly excluded
businesses of upcoming state-financed projects. Given the
opportunity to bid, they have submitted low bids and done
good work, to the benefit of the general contractor, the
contracting agency and the taxpayer.
For Lisa Campbell, a self-described hard-working
Republican from Chino Hills, these contracting programs
permitted her to build an environmental cleanup business
employing 150 people. But when Governor Wilson began his
efforts to end affirmative action, the bids slowed, and when
Proposition 209 passed, the phone stopped ringing. We don’t
have to take your bid, she was told, there’s no more
good-faith effort. Campbell is proud of the fact that she
was the low bidder on every contract she secured, but
without requests to bid or notification of upcoming jobs,
she has no opportunity to underbid her competition and prove
her qualifications.
The only way to keep open business opportunities for
innovative entrepreneurs like Lisa Campbell is to keep track
of discrimination in contracting, especially where large
public dollars are spent. The Legislature has required state
and local agencies to keep statistics on the utilization of
women- and minority-owned businesses. Yet, the statutes
providing for this record-keeping are among those that the
Governor proposes to repeal. If this data is no longer
recorded, it will be much harder to track the discrimination
that still exists.
The remaining threatened programs provide for affirmative
action in employment, including outreach and recruitment
programs for the state civil service and state-regulated
union/management apprenticeship programs. Of the 900-plus
elevator construction and service workers in the three-state
region that includes much of California, for example, only
about a dozen are women. But without affirmative action,
says elevator construction worker L.J. Dolin, there wouldn’t
be any. Dolin graduated first in her class of 200 at the
Army mechanics school at Fort Jackson, but she spent five
years trying to get a foot in the door, and several more
trying to get in enough hours to reach journey level.
|
|
|
In addition to
these personal profiles and detailed descriptions of these
valuable programs, we have also included a legal and public
policy discussion explaining why affirmative action programs
that avoid using preferences are still necessary and still
fair.
We would be remiss if we did not pay tribute to the
extraordinary courage of the individuals profiled in these
pages. They are speaking out at a time when the climate in
this state has become so hostile to programs ensuring equal
opportunity that many individuals-and, indeed, many of the
programs-are fearful of defending them.
When Martin Luther King, Jr. lobbied for affirmative
action programs in the 1960s, he may have never envisioned
the vital recruitment, outreach, counseling and mentoring
that make up affirmative action in the 1990s. In these pages
you will read how valuable these programs are to open the
doors of opportunity to all of the people in our state. It
is up to all of us to ensure that as individual Californians
like those profiled in this booklet reach for the American
dream, it not be snatched from their grasp.
David B. Oppenheimer
Associate Professor of Law
Golden Gate University
San Francisco
|
|
 |
|
|