Women’s March Series: Should I ‘Cancel’ the Women’s March?

Mei Mei Chan, Finance Assistant

The Women’s March Series

Equal Rights Advocates is among the thousands of organizations and millions of people who have joined three Women’s Marches since 2017. Many of us share a common belief that freedom and equality belong to all of us. Many of us call for change to reach both. But each of us march (or don’t march) for different reasons. Each of us experience oppression, exploitation and fear as differently as we experience joy, abundance and safety.

As the Women’s March approaches its fourth year, we have observed what happens when some people who have designated themselves as Women’s March leaders try to speak for all of us. At Equal Rights Advocates, we reject this effort. The beauty of the Women’s March is inclusion as defined by each person who steps alongside us, even if there is disagreement among us. Equal Rights Advocates does not toe an organizational line when it comes to the Women’s March. We encourage every staff member to express their views. We publish a few here. They are beautiful, fierce, and independent. This is our movement, and we are proud of it.

– Noreen Farrell, Executive Director

Join us at the March Jan. 18


By Mei Mei Chan, Finance Assistant

The feminist community is not fragile. We can talk about difficult things together.

Should I RSVP in the negative to the Women’s March?

You may wonder, how could I even consider the possibility of not going to the Women’s March? It’s the Women’s March! Since fall 2016, this has been the single biggest event in the U.S. uniting women and progressives on a single front against the 45th presidential administration (watching U.S. Women’s Soccer may be a close second).

As a staff member at a feminist organization, I know the implications of the priceless hype around this day, the humongous crowds of people we can connect with, the opportunities. The opportunities!

But other people before me have canceled the Women’s March. They’re not even Trump supporters, either. People who used to be a part of the Women’s March at some point decided to leave. Our very own people have quietly (or not so quietly) RSVP’d in the negative. 

At present, we must admit that the Women’s March chooses to sustain itself by flattening a widely diverse progressive movement into a specific narrative of feminism that centers white, cisgender, and elitist issues.

In 2018, S.T. Holloway wrote a piece for the Huffington Post titled, “Why This Black Girl Will Not Be Returning To The Women’s March,” explaining that she would no longer attend because it became clear to her that the constituents of the Women’s March did not actively support black women’s political issues, such as rampant police brutality in black communities, the unconscionably high black maternal death rate, and more. Holloway ends her piece with a very damning statement, “Until OUR issues become all of our issues, I cannot continue to lend my voice, my strength and my power to a movement or a brand of feminism that seeks to end the oppression of some of its members, while some of its members continue to aid in the oppression of others.”

Even as early as fall 2016, Rosie Campos explained her resignation from her role as a local Women’s March organizer in her Medium article, “Dear White Women: This is not about us,” where she reflects on the criticisms of the Women’s March as culturally appropriative and racist.

When we engage ourselves with another person or movement, the public often perceives our engagement to mean a co-signing of what they have said or done. Cancel culture dictates that if we don’t wish to appear as if we endorse what someone else has done or said, then we could dissociate ourselves from them. We cancel them and withdraw our endorsement of their continued influence and power.

When the Women’s March ousted Muslim-American activist Zahra Billoo in September 2019 from their Board of Directors, the Women’s March was undergoing a barrage of criticisms for alleged anti-semitism among the organization’s leadership. Tweets by Zahra Billoo surfaced within hours of the announcement of her inclusion on the new board of directors, and people zeroed in on her criticisms of Israel’s treatment of Palestine.  

Afraid that choosing to keep Zahra Billoo on the board would make them appear to engage with anti-semitism, the leaders gave her a message along the lines of: “The organization is too fragile to handle this.” The leaders of the Women’s March were afraid of being canceled because of their association with her. So instead, they canceled Zahra Billoo.

In her interview with Haute Hijab, Zahra Billoo asked, “What is fragility, and what does it look like that we want to work together … but the moment you are attacked for something like this, you are cast aside?”

Rather than remain engaged with each other and work together to confront our true adversaries, casting people out of our own communities alienates ourselves from each other.

What does it look like when we cancel each other? What does it look like when we cast each other aside?

According to their website, the Women’s March National declares that their mission is “to harness the political power of diverse women and their communities to create transformative social change.” Was their decision to oust Zahra Billoo in line with who they say they are?

For many people, the fact that the Women’s March has made so many decisions in conflict with their mission is good enough reason to cancel them. There are so many reasons for us to consider canceling the Women’s March, to withdraw our endorsement of their power and influence. 

At present, we must admit that the Women’s March chooses to sustain itself by flattening a widely diverse progressive movement into a specific narrative of feminism that centers white, cisgender, and elitist issues.

Here is a short list of perspectives that the Women’s March has been actively or implicitly excluding and why it’s so problematic:

Excluding women of color.

Excluding transgender and gender-nonconforming people.

Excluding people from working class communities.

It does not have to be this way.

Recently I watched a YouTube video titled “Canceling,” by progressive thinker, activist, and video essayist Natalie Wynn, better known by her YouTube handle Contrapoints. In her video, Natalie Wynn explains that when we cancel people in our own communities, we do ourselves a great disservice. Rather than remain engaged with each other and work together to confront our true adversaries, casting people out of our own communities alienates ourselves from each other.

I believe that many of the leaders and constituents of the Women’s March made mistakes. But we can change. 

The feminist community is not fragile. We can talk about difficult things together.

Today, I’m not casting aside the Women’s March. I hope that in the future the Women’s March won’t cast me aside, either.


This piece is part of a series by Equal Rights Advocates staff about personal decisions whether to participate in Women’s March 2020. Read Deputy Director Delia Coleman’s perspective, and Executive Director Noreen Farrell’s perspective.

Recommended reading, also linked above:

Stay Connected & Take Action

Continue to EqualRights.org

Coronavirus and Title IX

If you are a student worried about how the coronavirus (COVID-19) could impact your Title IX case, we can help.

Learn more

Legal Advice & Resources / Consejos y Recursos legales

Know Your Rights

Learn what your rights are so you can navigate your situation and make the best decision for you.

Your Rights at Work
Your Rights at School

Contact Us

Due to our current caseload, we are unfortunately not able to offer appointments for employment-related issues right now. Please see our Know Your Rights guides for information about your rights at work.

For issues at school, temporarily we can only help with:
- Sexual harassment or sexual assault in higher education
- Gender-based harassment or discrimination (including sexual harassment or assault) of LGBTQI+ individuals at all grade levels

Tell us about your situation

Learn More

We have trained legal advocates and lawyers on staff to guide you through your legal issue.

Note: Due to limited capacity, our staff can currently only assist new clients with select issues at school or related to education. We hope to re-open our employment-related intakes soon.

Conozca Sus Derechos

Aprende sus derechos para que puedas navegar su situación y tomar la mejor decisión para ti.

Sus Derechos en el Trabajo


Por el volumen de nuestros casos, desafortunadamente no podemos ofrecer citas nuevas por cualquier problema relacionada a empleo en este momento. Favor de leer nuestro Guia de Conocer Sus Derechos para información sobre sus derechos en el trabajo.

Para problemas a su escuela, temporalmente, solo podemos ayudar con:
- Acoso sexual o agresión sexual en la universidad
- Acoso o discriminación basado en el género (incluyendo acoso sexual o agresión sexual) de personas que son LGBTQI+ de cualquier nivel de grado


Nuestro servicio de asesoramiento por teléfono está cerrado por ahora

En este momento, no estamos recibiendo solicitudes dejadas por un recado de teléfono. Sin embargo, usted puede someter una solicitud para una consulta por la manera de hacer clic en el link "Explíquenos Sobre Su Situacion."

Aprender Mas
Tenemos defensores legales y abogados capacitados para guiarle por su problema legal. Nota: Por nuestra capacidad limitada, nuestros empleados solo pueden ayudar a los clientes nuevos que tienen problems specificas relaciada a la escuela. Esperamos que podemos abrir de nuevo las citas de empleo muy pronto.